Traqueotomía versus traqueostomía, la necesidad de una aclaración lexicográfica / Tracheotomy versus tracheostomy, the need for lexicographical clarification

Con frecuencia se usan en el ámbito sanitario los términos traqueotomía y traqueostomía, pudiendo generar dudas entre los propios profesionales sobre qué definición corresponde a cada término o cuál de ellos debe considerarse más correcto en casos concretos. Se ha realizado una búsqueda de los términos «traqueotomía» y «traqueostomía» en los diccionarios generalistas en idioma español del Diccionario de la Real Academia Española (DRAE) y del Diccionario Histórico de la Lengua Española de la Real Academia Española (DHLE), y de los términos en inglés «tracheotomy» y «tracheostomy» en los diccionarios generalistas en idioma inglés del Oxford Dictionary, del Cambridge Dictionary y del Collins English Dictionary. Asimismo, se ha hecho una búsqueda en los diccionarios de términos médicos en español del Diccionario de Términos Médicos de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina (DTM) y en inglés del Farlex Dictionary. Los términos se buscaron también en el buscador generalista de Internet Google®. Se analizaron las definiciones desde el punto de vista lexicográfico y etimológico. Las definiciones que aparecen en los diccionarios generalistas, tanto en español como en inglés, son imprecisas, limitadas y adolecen de ambigüedad por mezclar indicaciones desactualizadas con criterios alejados de la etimología. Sin embargo, las definiciones en los diccionarios de términos médicos en ambos idiomas están más ajustadas a la etimología. La traqueotomía identifica estrictamente el procedimiento quirúrgico de realización de una apertura en la cara anterior de la tráquea. La traqueostomía identifica la realización de un orificio que comunica la tráquea con el exterior e implica una modificación del tracto aéreo superior al proporcionar una entrada adicional de la vía respiratoria. Solo en las laringectomías totales la traqueostomía es la única vía de entrada al tracto aéreo. Ambos términos pueden utilizarse sinónimamente cuando una traqueotomía culmina con una traqueostomía. No convendrá utilizar el término traqueostomía cuando se produce el cierre de los planos al final del procedimiento y este no resulta en la creación de un estoma. Los traqueostomas pueden ser cualificados con adjetivos de tiempo de permanencia (temporal/permanente), tamaño (grande/pequeño), forma (redondo/elíptico), o profundidad por sí mismos, sin vincularse a ningún tipo de enfermedad o de indicación quirúrgica. No todos los traqueostomas permanentes tienen lugar en laringectomías totales ni tienen sistemáticamente un carácter irreversible.(AU)

In the healthcare field, the terms “traqueotomía” and “traqueostomía” are frequently used, often leading to confusion among professionals regarding the appropriate definition for each term or which one should be considered more correct in specific cases. A search was conducted for the terms “traqueotomía” and “traqueostomía” in general Spanish-language dictionaries such as the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (DRAE) and the Historical Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Royal Spanish Academy (DHLE), as well as for the English terms “tracheotomy” and “tracheostomy” in English general dictionaries like the Oxford Dictionary, the Cambridge Dictionary, and the Collins English Dictionary. Additionally, searches were performed in medical dictionaries in both Spanish, specifically the Dictionary of Medical Terms of the National Academy of Medicine (DTM), and English, including the Farlex Dictionary. The terms were also explored using the Google search engine. Definitions were analyzed from both lexicographical and etymological perspectives. Definitions found in general dictionaries, in both Spanish and English, were found to be imprecise, limited, and ambiguous, as they mixed outdated indications with criteria that deviated from etymology. In contrast, definitions in medical dictionaries in both languages were more aligned with etymology. “Traqueotomía” strictly identifies the surgical procedure of creating an opening in the anterior face of the trachea. “Traqueostomía” identifies the creation of an opening that connects the trachea to the exterior, involving a modification of the upper airway by providing an additional entry for the respiratory pathway. “Traqueostomía” becomes the sole means of entry to the airway in total laryngectomies. Both terms can be used synonymously when a traqueotomía culminates in a traqueostomía. However, it is not appropriate to use the term “traqueostomía” when the procedure concludes with the closure of the planes and does not result in the creation of a stoma. Traqueostomas can be qualified with adjectives indicating permanence (temporary/permanent), size (large/small), shape (round/elliptical), or depth, without being linked to any specific disease or surgical indication. Not all permanent traqueostomas are the result of total laryngectomies, and they do not necessarily have an irreversible character systematically.(AU)

Tracheotomy versus tracheostomy, the need for lexicographical clarification.

In the healthcare field, the terms "traqueotomía" and "traqueostomía" are frequently used, often leading to confusion among professionals regarding the appropriate definition for each term or which one should be considered more correct in specific cases. A search was conducted for the terms "traqueotomía" and "traqueostomía" in general Spanish-language dictionaries such as the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy (DRAE) and the Historical Dictionary of the Spanish Language of the Royal Spanish Academy (DHLE), as well as for the English terms "tracheotomy" and "tracheostomy" in English general dictionaries like the Oxford Dictionary, the Cambridge Dictionary, and the Collins English Dictionary. Additionally, searches were performed in medical dictionaries in both Spanish, specifically the Dictionary of Medical Terms of the National Academy of Medicine (DTM), and English, including the Farlex Dictionary. The terms were also explored using the Google search engine. Definitions were analyzed from both lexicographical and etymological perspectives. Definitions found in general dictionaries, in both Spanish and English, were found to be imprecise, limited, and ambiguous, as they mixed outdated indications with criteria that deviated from etymology. In contrast, definitions in medical dictionaries in both languages were more aligned with etymology. "Traqueotomía" strictly identifies the surgical procedure of creating an opening in the anterior face of the trachea. "Traqueostomía" identifies the creation of an opening that connects the trachea to the exterior, involving a modification of the upper airway by providing an additional entry for the respiratory pathway. "Traqueostomía" becomes the sole means of entry to the airway in total laryngectomies. Both terms can be used synonymously when a traqueotomía culminates in a traqueostomía. However, it is not appropriate to use the term "traqueostomía" when the procedure concludes with the closure of the planes and does not result in the creation of a stoma. Traqueostomas can be qualified with adjectives indicating permanence (temporary/permanent), size (large/small), shape (round/elliptical), or depth, without being linked to any specific disease or surgical indication. Not all permanent traqueostomas are the result of total laryngectomies, and they do not necessarily have an irreversible character systematically.

Comparison Study of FNAC Using the Milan System Cytopathology versus Definitive Histology for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland tumors (SGT) represent 6 to 8 percent of head and neck tumors. The cytologic diagnosis of SGT is performed by fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) with variable sensitivity and specificity. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) categorizes the cytological results and provides the risk of malignancy (ROM). The aim of our study was to evaluate the cytological findings with the definitive pathological findings to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in SGT according to MSRSGC classification. METHOD: An observational, retrospective, single-center study was carried out at a tertiary referral hospital over a period of 10 years. Patients that underwent FNAC for major SGT and that have undergone surgery to remove the tumor were included. A histopathological follow-up was performed on the surgically excised lesions. Results from the FNAC were categorized into one of the six MSRSGC categories. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for determining benign and malignant cases were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 417 cases were analyzed. The cytological prediction of ROM was 10% in nondiagnostic, 12.12% in non-neoplastic, 3.58% in neoplasm benign group, 60% in AUS and SUMP groups, and 100% in suspicious and malignant group. The statistical analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for determining benign cases was 99%, 55%, 94%, 93%, and 94%, respectively, and for determining malignant neoplasm was 54%, 99%, 93%, 94%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our hands, MSRSGC is highly sensitive for benign tumors and highly specific for malignant tumors. The low sensitivity to differentiate malignant from benign cases makes it necessary to apply an adequate anamnesis, physical examination, and imaging tests to consider surgical treatment in most cases.

Unidad de Atención al Paciente Traqueostomizado. Una solución innovadora desde Otorrinolaringología con carácter transversal para el hospital / Tracheostomy Patient Care Unit. An innovative Otorhinolaryngology solution of a transversal nature for the hospital

Antecedentes y objetivo: Los cuidados de los pacientes traqueostomizados son habilidades de alto riesgo y baja incidencia. Las estrategias de mejora de la atención sanitaria en plantas hospitalarias y en especialidades distintas a la Otorrinolaringología (ORL) basadas únicamente en la formación no han sido capaces de ofrecer una solución adecuada. Se presenta un modelo de Unidad de Atención al Paciente Traqueostomizado dirigida por el Servicio de Otorrinolaringología para atender a todos los pacientes traqueostomizados de un hospital en todas las especialidades. Material y métodos Ámbito: hospital universitario público de tercer nivel con 876 camas de hospitalización y 30 camas de UCI para 481.296 habitantes. Modelo de Unidad: unidad transversal para el hospital proporcionando atención a todos los pacientes traqueostomizados, adultos y niños, de todas las especialidades, con dedicación del 50% de una enfermera de ORL de hospitalización que se desplaza hasta la cama de hospitalización de la especialidad de cada paciente y el 50% de otra enfermera de ORL de consultas externas para los pacientes ambulatorios, con la consultoría de un especialista en ORL y coordinación de la supervisora de ORL. Resultados Se atendió en la unidad a 572 pacientes entre 2016 y 2021, el 80% varones, con una media de edad de 63±14 años. Se atendieron 14,7±2 pacientes traqueostomizados diarios y 96±4 consultas por complicaciones anuales, elevándose hasta 19 pacientes traqueostomizados diarios en 2020 y 141±8,4 consultas por complicaciones en los años 2020 y 2021, durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Se redujo la estancia media de las especialidades no ORL en 13 días a lo largo de los 6 años del estudio, aumentando la satisfacción de los profesionales de ORL y de no ORL, y la satisfacción de los usuarios.... (AU)

Background and objective: The care of tracheostomized patients are high risk skills and low incidence. Strategies for improvement of health care in hospital wards and specialties other than otolaryngology based solely on training have not been able to offer an adequate solution. A tracheostomized patient unit is presented directed by the otolaryngology service to attend all tracheostomized hospitalized patients of all specialties. Material and methods Background: Third level public hospital with 876 hospitalization beds and 30 ICU beds for 481,296 inhabitants. Unit model: Transversal unit for the hospital providing attention to all tracheostomized patients, adults, and children, of all specialties, with dedication of 50% of a ENT nurse of hospitalization that moves to the hospitalization bed of the specialty of each patient and 50% of another office ENT nurse for ambulatory patients care, with the consultancy of an ENT specialist and coordinated by the ENT supervisor. Results 572 patients between 2016 and 2021, 80% men, aged 63±14 years, were attended in the unit. 14.7±2 tracheostomized patients daily and 96±4 complication annual consultations were attended, rising up to 19 tracheostomized patients daily by 2020 and 141±8.4 consultations by complications in 2020 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The mean stay of the non-ENT specialties was reduced in 13 days, increasing the satisfaction of the ENT and non-ENT professionals and the satisfaction of the users. ... (AU)

Tracheostomy Patient Care Unit. An innovative Otorhinolaryngology solution of a transversal nature for the hospital.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The care of tracheostomized patients are high risk skills and low incidence. Strategies for improvement of health care in hospital wards and specialties other than otolaryngology based solely on training have not been able to offer an adequate solution. A tracheostomized patient unit is presented directed by the otolaryngology service to attend all tracheostomized hospitalised patients of all specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Background: Third level public hospital with 876 hospitalisation beds and 30 ICU beds for 481,296 inhabitants. Unit model: Transversal unit for the hospital providing attention to all tracheostomized patients, adults, and children, of all specialties, with dedication of 50% of a ENT nurse of hospitalisation that moves to the hospitalisation bed of the specialty of each patient and 50% of another office ENT nurse for ambulatory patients care, with the consultancy of an ENT specialist and coordinated by the ENT supervisor. RESULTS: 572 patients between 2016 and 2021, 80% men, aged 63 ± 14 years, were attended in the Unit. 14.7 ± 2 tracheostomized patients daily and 96 ± 4 complication annual consultations were attended, rising up to 19 tracheostomized patients daily by 2020 and 141 ± 8.4 consultations by complications in 2020 and 2021, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The mean stay of the non-ENT specialties was reduced in 13 days, increasing the satisfaction of the ENT and non-ENT professionals and the satisfaction of the users. CONCLUSIONS: A Tracheostomized Patient Care Unit proactively directed from the Otorhinolaryngology Service to transversally care for all tracheostomized patients improves the quality of health care by reducing stay, complications, and emergencies. Improves the satisfaction of non-otolaryngological professionals by reducing the anxiety of facing care of patients who lack knowledge and experience and that of ENT specialists and nurses by reducing unplanned extemporaneous demands for care. Improves user satisfaction by perceiving adequate continuity of care. The Otorhinolaryngology Services provide their experience in the management of laryngectomized and tracheostomized patients and in teamwork with other specialists and professionals without the need to create new structures outside Otorhinolaryngology.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of otorhinolaryngology residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Training in surgical specialties has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study was carried out to further analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on specific aspects of clinical, training, and research activities performed by the otolaryngology residents in Spain. METHODS: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted during the last two weeks of February 2021. The study consisted of an online survey taken by otolaryngology residents who had undertaken one-year continuing training from February 15, 2020, to February 15, 2021, and consisted of 26 questions exploring the impact of the COVID-19 on the health of the ENT residents and training activities. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage. When indicated, Pearson's Chi-square test (χ2) with Yates's correction and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used. RESULTS: 143 completed surveys were received from 264 Residents (54.17%). 36 residents (25.2%) have suffered from the disease due to SARS-CoV-2. Most of them only developed mild symptoms (86.1%), with 3 requiring hospitalisation (8.3%). The origin of infection was unknown in all reported cases and the need for confinement was principally due to either attending an asymptomatic patient in 9 cases (6.3%) or to being supposedly in close contact with an asymptomatic person in 22 (15.4%). 60.1% of the residents surveyed reported having lost more than 6 months of their training period, and in 18.8% of cases, it was as high as 10 and 12 months. There has been a reduction of more than 75% of what was planned in surgical training (p<0.05) of tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, stapedectomy, cochlear implants, endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery, septoplasty and turbinoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The decline in ENT activity and residents having to assist in other COVID-19 units during the most critical moments of the pandemic, has caused the main reduction in their training capacity. Contagion mainly occurred through contact with asymptomatic carriers during patient care and through supposedly close contact with asymptomatic carriers. Virtual activities have been widely accepted, but they have not completely replaced all residents' training needs. Measures should be implemented to recover lost training, especially surgical practical learning in otology and rhinology.

Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la formación de los residentes de otorrinolaringología / Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of otorhinolaryngology residents

Antecedentes y objetivosLa pandemia COVID-19 ha alterado todas las actividades sanitarias, entre ellas la formación especializada de los residentes. Se llevó a cabo un estudio para analizar en profundidad el impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en aspectos específicos de las actividades clínicas, formativas e investigadoras que realizan los residentes de otorrinolaringología (ORL) en España durante un año completo de formación.MétodosSe realizó un estudio cualitativo transversal durante las últimas dos semanas de febrero de 2021. El estudio consistió en una encuesta en línea realizada por residentes de ORL que habían realizado un año continuado de formación desde el 15 de febrero de 2020 al 15 de febrero de 2021 y consistió en 26 preguntas que exploraban el impacto del COVID-19 en la salud de los residentes de ORL, en su dedicación laboral y en las actividades de formación. Las variables categóricas se informaron como frecuencia y porcentaje. Cuando se indicó, se utilizó la prueba chi-cuadrado de Pearson con la corrección de Yates y el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson (r).ResultadosSe recibieron 143 encuestas cumplimentadas de 264 residentes (54,17%). Treinta y seis residentes (25,2%) habían padecido la enfermedad por SARS-CoV-2. La mayoría de ellos solo desarrollaron síntomas leves (86,1%) y 3 requirieron hospitalización (8,3%). Los residentes encuestados que resultaron positivos para SARS-CoV-2 no fueron capaces de identificar la fuente de su contagio y la necesidad de confinamiento se debió principalmente a la atención de un paciente asintomático en 9 casos (6,3%) o al contacto estrecho con un asintomático en situaciones no identificadas distintas de la atención sanitaria en 22 (15,4%). El 60,1% de los residentes encuestados reportaron haber perdido más de 6meses de su período de formación, y en el 18,8% de los casos llegaron a 10 y 12meses. (AU)

Background and objectivesTraining in surgical specialties has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study was carried out to further analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on specific aspects of clinical, training, and research activities performed by the otolaryngology residents in Spain.MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted during the last two weeks of February 2021. The study consisted of an online survey taken by otolaryngology residents who had undertaken one-year continuing training from February 15, 2020, to February 15, 2021, and consisted of 26 questions exploring the impact of the COVID-19 on the health of the ENT residents and training activities. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage. When indicated, Pearsońs Chi-square test (χ2) with Yates's correction and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used.Results143 completed surveys were received from 264 residents (54.17%). 36 residents (25.2%) have suffered from the disease due to SARS-CoV-2. Most of them only developed mild symptoms (86.1%), with 3 requiring hospitalization (8.3%). The origin of infection was unknown in all reported cases and the need for confinement was principally due to either attending an asymptomatic patient in 9 cases (6.3%) or to being supposedly in close contact with an asymptomatic person in 22 (15.4%). 60.1% of the residents surveyed reported having lost more than 6months of their training period, and in 18.8% of cases, it was as high as 10 and 12months. There has been a reduction of more than 75% of what was planned in surgical training (P<.05) of tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, stapedectomy, cochlear implants, endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery, septoplasty and turbinoplasty. (AU)

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of otorhinolaryngology residents]. / Impacto de la pandemia COVID-19 en la formación de los residentes de otorrinolaringología.

Background and objectives: Training in surgical specialties has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic. A study was carried out to further analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on specific aspects of clinical, training, and research activities performed by the otolaryngology residents in Spain. Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted during the last two weeks of February 2021. The study consisted of an online survey taken by otolaryngology residents who had undertaken one-year continuing training from February 15, 2020, to February 15, 2021, and consisted of 26 questions exploring the impact of the COVID-19 on the health of the ENT residents and training activities. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage. When indicated, Pearsons Chi-square test (χ2) with Yates's correction and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used. Results: 143 completed surveys were received from 264 residents (54.17%). 36 residents (25.2%) have suffered from the disease due to SARS-CoV-2. Most of them only developed mild symptoms (86.1%), with 3 requiring hospitalization (8.3%). The origin of infection was unknown in all reported cases and the need for confinement was principally due to either attending an asymptomatic patient in 9 cases (6.3%) or to being supposedly in close contact with an asymptomatic person in 22 (15.4%). 60.1% of the residents surveyed reported having lost more than 6 months of their training period, and in 18.8% of cases, it was as high as 10 and 12 months. There has been a reduction of more than 75% of what was planned in surgical training (P < .05) of tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, stapedectomy, cochlear implants, endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery, septoplasty and turbinoplasty. Conclusions: The decline in ENT activity and residents having to assist in other COVID-19 units during the most critical moments of the pandemic, has caused the main reduction in their training capacity. Contagion mainly occurred through contact with asymptomatic carriers during patient care and through supposedly close contact with asymptomatic carriers. Virtual activities have been widely accepted, but they have not completely replaced all residents' training needs. Measures should be implemented to recover lost training, especially surgical practical learning in otology and rhinology.

Seizure as Early Presentation of a Pneumocephalus after Cochlear Implant: A Case Report.

Pneumocephalus after cochlear implantation is very rare with five reported cases in the literature. The presence of clinical features in the immediate postoperative period has never been reported, because they occur weeks after surgery. These neurological manifestations can compromise the patient's life; thus, it is important to have proper knowledge and management of these manifestations. We present a case report with a review of the literature. A 35-year-old man began having seizures a few hours after a cochlear implantation. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a pneumocephalus and bone defect at the level of the electrode's drilling path, not objected during the surgery. The patient was handled conservatively, and in subsequent reviews, CT objected reabsorption of the pneumocephalus. The presence of a pneumocephalus should be taken into account in the neurological features of a patient with cochlear implant, especially if mastoid bone defects are suspected during surgery. The management of the pneumocephalus will, in most cases, be conservative, consisting of clinical observation and imaging tests. Surgical treatment is reserved for situations in which the clinical manifestations are very symptomatic and when they are tension pneumocephalus.